Search for: "Fields v. Louisiana et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2023, 2:09 am
V. et al. (2005). [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
Tran et al Flectere LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:42 am
Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., et al., No. 15-0225, Denbury opinion, that Denbury had shown as a matter of law that its line would serve a “public use. [read post]
7 May 2019, 7:30 am
Facts: This case (Fulmer et al v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 9:08 am
Price, et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – June 13th, 2019) involves an automobile accident between the plaintiff and the defendant. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:25 am
US 7,970,543, titled Predicting tropical cyclone destructive potential by integrated kinetic energy according to the Powell/Reinhold scale, lists as inventors Powell and Reinhold and cites papers to Powell et al. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 5:40 am
Carter-Langham, Inc., et al case, the court concluded that the landowner could not sue the sublessee under the mineral lease at issue because the sublessee had concluded its operations under that lease prior to the Louisiana Mineral Code becoming effective. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:06 am
Tesla Offshore, L.L.C. et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – September 29th, 2015) involves an accident between a chartered boat and a drilling rig. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
Hepatitis A outbreaks associated with fresh, frozen, and minimally processed produce, worldwide, from 1983 to 2016Year# CasesImplicated foodLocation of casesSource of implicated foodSuspected cause of contaminationReference198324Raspberries (frozen)ScotlandScotlandInfected pickers or packersReid et al., 1987[1]19875Raspberries (frozen)ScotlandTayside, ScotlandInfected pickers Ramsay and Upton, 1989[2]1988202Iceberg lettuceKentuckyUnknown, suspected to be from MexicoBelieved to… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:55 am
Back to the intersection of abortion and tort: Among the filings that reached the Court at the end of 2019 is Brief of Tort Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of June Medical Services L.L.C. et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:48 pm
V. et al. (2005). [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:44 am
V. et al. (2005). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
Leal et al, 2020 WL 5544204 (S.D. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm
Year# CasesImplicated foodLocation of casesSource of implicated foodSuspected cause of contaminationReference198324Raspberries (frozen)ScotlandScotlandInfected pickers or packersReid et al., 1987[11]19875Raspberries (frozen)ScotlandTayside, ScotlandInfected pickers Ramsay and Upton, 1989[12]1988202Iceberg lettuceKentuckyUnknown, suspected to be from MexicoBelieved to have occurred prior to distribution, since multiple restaurants involved Rosenblum et… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
Louisiana, 11-8470, not to be confused with Dorsey v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
That aligns with the continued robustness of the core principles of globalization based on idea of a level playing field in which states have a duty to enhance value in the macro community, while economic enterprises have a micro obligation of value enhancement (mindful of business, legal, and financial risk) toward its community of investors or in some instances for the enhancement of its value as a going concern (discussed here). [read post]
