Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 21 - 40 of 15,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  According to CSBS, Figure’s charter application is intended to further “the OCC’s stated goal of deliberately maneuvering around the adverse [New York federal district court ruling in Vullo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:11 am by Tarek Maalouf
On the Sixth Circuit Keith famously wrote the unanimous decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:46 am
Vonage, 503 F.3d 1295, and concluded:We conclude that the embodiment in Figure 3 was improperly excluded from the scope of claim 1. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:21 am by Daniel S. Swinton, Esq.
v=In1IJocVor8Quick facts 5.4 million Americans are living with Alzheimer's disease. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:34 am
Hendiadys is a figure of speech in which two terms, separated by a conjunction, have a single complex meaning. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  We’ve been talking about Missouri v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
 The 6th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” SeeHockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:01 am
Co. v Butts to apply to public figures who were not public officials. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:53 am by propertyprof
We discussed the common law right of publicity today in class, particularly the 1993 9th Circuit Vanna White v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
So what can Apple/Mr Jobs' estate do if InIcon were to market and sell the action figure in the United Kingdom? [read post]