Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 21 - 40 of 12,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallIn 2007, Professor Jack Balkin of Yale Law School shocked the academic world by arguing that Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:52 pm
  So relatively slim pickings.Still, I thought that today's (sole) opinion helped prove the point that you can sometimes figure out the way a case will come out merely by seeing the manner in which the opinion frames the facts.For example, here, the first paragraph of the opinion seemed fairly pro-plaintiff, or at least not anti-her. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Angie Gou
“Luckily I did not have to sit there on my own and try to figure it out. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am by Steve Lubet
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:10 am
" Schauer points out that the fact that the Constitution is written does not preclude expansive and flexible interpretations--noting that Chief Justice Marshall suggested as much in McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:46 am by Nedim Malovic
Other factors may also be considered, such as the distribution channels of the goods concerned (Caventa v OHIM, T‑224/11).In the present case, the goods were neither of the same nature nor the same purpose, nor were they of the same type nor intended for the same purpose or for the same use. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:22 am by SHG
He began, as so many do these days, with the Supreme Court’s shadow docket decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
’ [10](iii)(c) ‘Although the Second Claimant is not herself a public figure she is, as the First Claimant’s mother, closely associated with a public figure and her right to privacy is accordingly diminished. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
 Pix Credit: Business and Human Rights Resource Centre "La Cour de cassation a annoncé, mardi 7 septembre, qu'elle invalidait la décision de la cour d'appel de Paris d'annuler la mise en examen du cimentier Lafarge pour "complicité de crimes contre l'humanité" dans l'enquête sur ses activités en Syrie jusqu'en 2014. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 12:15 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
IP leaders including retired Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel and law professor Kristen Osenga submitted amicus briefs in FTC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 12:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
IP leaders including retired Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel and law professor Kristen Osenga submitted amicus briefs in FTC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 2:03 am by Keith Mallinson
” It was a key question in selecting “comparable licenses” in TCL v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:46 am by Law Office of Brett A Podolsky
That, or they simply didn’t have the membership figures to provide you with a worthwhile experience. [read post]