Search for: "Finkelstein v Finkelstein"
Results 41 - 60
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
The law is clear that scientific certainty is not required to prove causation to the legal standard of proof on a balance of probabilities (See: Snell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:26 pm
Open source v proprietary software". [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:47 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:18 pm
ACCC v Allergy Pathway In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 74 Justice Finkelstein of the Federal Court fined Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (formerly known as Advanced Allergy Elimination) and its director, Mr Paul Keir, $7,500 each for contempt of undertakings made to the court following a successful 2009 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission action for false, misleading and deceptive conduct. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
There is no dispute that Antilla included certain facts tending to support the short sellers’ story: Howard Finkelstein was a convicted felon who had, in fact, used the alias “Robert Howard,” see United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Brock v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
Resolved cases include: A woman v The People, Clause 1, 3, 6, 07/06/2012; Mr David Wieberg v The Guardian, Clause 1, 06/06/2012; Mary Reid v Daily Record, Clause 1, 01/06/2012; A woman v Kent & Sussex Courier, Clauses 1, 5, 6 31/05/2012; Adam Wood v Yorkshire Evening Post, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Belinda Cunnison v Berwickshire News, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daventry Express, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Helen Belcher… [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:38 am
The Finkelstein Inquiry After much anticipation from media stakeholders, Ray Finkelstein QC delivered the Report of the Independent Inquiry into Media and Media Regulation in February 2012. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
Australia’s High Court famously left the door open for a possible privacy tort in the ABC v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:41 pm
In the Finkelstein report into the media the phrase “public interest” was used 85 times. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:14 am
In Lue v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 03259 Decided on April 26, 2012 Appellate Division, Third Department we see a labor law case which partially settled, and in which one defendant declared bankruptcy. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions The Finkelstein Report (see Inforrm post) provoked a “harrumphing chorus“, writes Alan Kohler on the Business Spectator, in a post assessing its recommendations for Australian media regulation reform. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
It was coincidental that the cricket libel case, Cairns v Modi and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
In Australia, the Finkelstein inquiry published earlier this month has recommended the establishment of a government-funded “News Media Council” to set and enforce journalistic standards. [read post]
