Search for: "Finkelstein v Finkelstein"
Results 121 - 130
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 65 (2009). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Allen v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
