Search for: "Fisher, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 1,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 9:53 am by Daily Record Staff
Fisher, in his capacity as the personal representative of his father’s estate, appeals the ... [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:08 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Fisher appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree recklessly endangering safety while using a dangerous weapon. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, has died at age 80.During his 20 years on the bench, Fisher authored about 400 judicial opinions. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit got the issue wrong — on the second try as well as on the first. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit refused on Wednesday to rehear the sequel of the University of Texas affirmative action case, Fisher v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:12 am by Adam Steinman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in City of Fishers, Indiana v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 am by Steve Vladeck
Add to that the bottom line of the Supreme Court’s 2012 ruling in Fisher I – which seemed to be a not-so-thinly-veiled hint to the court of appeals that a majority of the Justices had serious qualms with the constitutionality of the UT approach, one which the Fifth Circuit politely ignored on remand in reaffirming its earlier decision. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider a new decision upholding the policy. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of Fisher's background, the Houston Chronicle noted:At the time [of her application to UTexas], Fisher was a senior at Stephen F. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal's judgment in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 4:52 am
Application BL 0/003/10 12 Jan 2010 the applicant appealed against the examiner's report that the claims of the invention were excluded from patentability because they [read post]