Search for: "Fisher v. District Court" Results 521 - 540 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 3:05 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a district court decision allowing Jose Padilla to sue John Yoo. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  Padilla has asked the Supreme Court to review that ruling (Lebron, et al., v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:14 am by John Elwood
We therefore hold that Yoo must be granted qualified immunity, and accordingly reverse the decision of the district court. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:42 am by Jon Sands
 Here, one defendant struck gold in that he did challenge within the time frame, and got his conviction reversed because the district court precluded him from challenging the Service's decision denying his plan of operations. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:01 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
A district court granted an employee's motion for summary judgment on the issue of damages. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Fisher 36 AD3d 486 (1 Dept 2007), but see, Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern,LLP, 63 AD3d 1531 [4th Dept 2009); Izko Sportswear CQ,. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Last week, the parties finally met for trial in a Manhattan District Court before Judge Shira Scheindlin. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Fisher Tooling Co., 439 F.3d 1335, 1344 (Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Chris
” His experience in that case was undoubtedly helping the LDF to formulate it’s position in Fisher v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
  In that case, the Minnesota District Court dismissed the employer's claim because it found that the employees had authorized access to the information they allegedly stole. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm
  The district court grants summary judgment to the University of Oregon.The Ninth Circuit reverses.Judge Gould writes an opinion that -- reading between the lines -- hints that his own view is that there probably wasn't actionable discrimination, but nonetheless holds that the evidence from the student was sufficient to get to a jury. [read post]