Search for: "Fitzgerald v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
No nation has done more to advance the human condition than the United States of America and no people have done more to promote human progress than the citizens of our great nation. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
 The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More importantly, they state that it is medically desirable to do so. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
Fitzgerald states, Congress’s power to control, to regulate, to try to “conquer” the president, always raises constitutional questions. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by skelly
Seemingly, gone were the days of state “fictitious group” insurance laws prohibiting the grouping of individuals or entities for the purposes of buying insurance, replaced by a federal framework intended to provide consistent, economical and affordable coverage to commercial liability insureds across the United States. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 755–758 (1982); and the President's removal power, Myers v. [read post]