Search for: "Fix v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 9,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 3:02 am
Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families v Fletcher; Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14; [2011] WLR (D) 114 “It was objectively justified, under regulation 8 of the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002, for the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families to employ teachers on a succession of fixed-term contracts for… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:59 am
On June 23, 2015, in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am
The Court overturned the motion judge’s, finding that a provision stating that employment is for a fixed term, if stated unambiguously, will oust the implied term that reasonable notice must be given. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:12 am
In Tolliver Group, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:53 am
Talen Energy Marketing and CPV Maryland, LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:13 pm
In the sub-headline, the Hatch-Waxman Act is referred to as outdated.KSR v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:18 pm
In its judgment in Case C-531/07 Fachverband der Buch- und Medienwirtschaft v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2022) UKSC 7 In which the Supreme Court considered the position on termination of ‘flexible tenancies’ – fixed term secure tenancies – during the fixed term. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:47 pm
As there was no provision in the TCSA to address early termination of the agreement, Gordon J. applied the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Howard v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
ABSTRACT: n Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
ABSTRACT: n Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:28 am
Alschuler (University of Chicago Law School) has posted Terrible Tools for Prosecutors: Notes on Senator Leahy's Proposal to 'Fix' Skilling v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:19 pm
The 56-page complaint in State of Texas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:29 am
Supreme Court appears likely to fix a 50-year mistake following reports it has voted to overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:30 am
Florida Department of Environment Protection [Cornell LII backgrounder] that the state of Florida did not "take" property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment [text] where the state permanently fixed property boundaries as part of a beachfront restoration project. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:46 am
Howard Highland has posted his article, “A Regulatory Quick-Fix for Carcieri V. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other… [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 10:40 am
As previously reported, the OCC recently adopted a final rule (the “Madden fix”) designed to resolve the legal uncertainty created by the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 9:33 am
III case or controversy, the Supreme Court could potentially still hear an appeal under the doctrine of ASARCO v. [read post]
