Search for: "Flemming v. Flemming"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 5:45 am
Facts: This case (Maney et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Here, former counsel established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter [*2]of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating that their actions did not proximately cause the plaintiff’s alleged damages, and that subsequent counsel had a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiff’s rights (see Parklex Assoc. v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 AD3d 968, 970; Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum, & Vitulli, 215 A.D.3d 699 [2d Dept. 2023]; Park/ex Associates v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 A.D.3d 698 [2d Dept.2014 ]). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:32 am
“To establish causation, the plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the attorney’s negligence” (Parklex Assoc. v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 AD3d at 970). [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm
The leading New Jersey case is Flemming v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:20 pm
Torts — Motor torts — Motion for judgment In a jury trial, when considering a motion for judgment at the close of the plaintiff’s case, the court is required to “consider all evidence and inferences in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is made. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
, that he made one of them the centerpiece of "The New Property": Flemming v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Members (sorted by last name) include: Flemming Cassee (deputy Eugenia Valsami-Jones), NSC (EU); Emeric Frejafon, Institut national de l’environnement industriel et des risques (France); Monique Groenewold (deputy Eric Bleeker), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) (The Netherlands); Elisabeth Heunisch, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) (Germany); Jenny Holmqvist (deputy Celia Tanarro), ECHA (EU); Anke Jesse, Federal Ministry… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 9:05 pm
[Packingham v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 12:06 pm
” (See Rosenberger v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
This filing is part of the ICWA class action case in South Dakota over the interpretation of 25 USC 1922 (emergency jurisdiction): The third reason why this Court’s ruling on § 1922 has been inoperative is because the State’s Attorney for Pennington County, Defendant Mark Vargo, and the person Mr. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Flemming v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:52 am
Congress’s authority to modify provisions of the Social Security program was affirmed in the 1960 Supreme Court decision in Flemming v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
The amount you can deduct as a medical expense is limited to the amount by which the cost of the special food exceeds the cost of a normal diet (Flemming v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 6:28 pm
The Florida appeals court ruled that collateral estoppel did not apply to completely bar the former employee’s civil claim, but that the trial court should not have dismissed the claim without conducting an evidentiary hearing on the stand-your-ground immunity claim (Professional Roofing and Sales, Inc v Flemmings). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:53 am
In Professional Roofing and Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:53 am
In Professional Roofing and Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
The amount you can deduct as a medical expense is limited to the amount by which the cost of the special food exceeds the cost of a normal diet (Flemming v. [read post]
