Search for: "Fletcher v. District Court" Results 61 - 80 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2014, 10:39 am by Jon Sands
  The district court disagreed, holding that ineffective assistance of state habeas counsel could never qualify as good cause to return to state court; it then dismissed the mixed § 2254 petition pursuant to Rose v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 12:31 pm
 You filed a federal lawsuit claiming that this program is unconstitutional, but the district court dismissed your lawsuit. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She wondered why the State was the petitioner here when the district court expressly did not include the State in the denial for an injunction against the Vanderbilt casino (it was a motion by the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians instead), a point made by the National Congress of American Indians. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Petitioner's appeal of the district court's order is pending in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:44 am by Jon Sands
”  Plus, the district court had reexamined other parts of the claim when the case was remanded for further proceedings in light of Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:19 am by Jon Sands
The district court was clearly disturbed by the sentence. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:10 pm by Jon Sands
Fletcher, Pregerson, and Graber). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:11 pm
 The district court caption starts with "01-", which means that this single matter has taken 15 years to get through the district court and the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
The Supreme Court in Harbison v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:55 pm by Jon Sands
Note the 9th reverses the district court where Kozinski sat as the D.J.The decision is here: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/11/20/13-16273.pdf [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
The 9th reverses a district court's granting of habeas relief. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 3:18 pm
 At least temporarily.Back in 2010 and 2011, a district court held that limiting concealed carry permits to those who have "good cause" for 'em was permissible under the Second Amendment. [read post]