Search for: "Flood v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 8:58 am
  That lack of understanding continues today: witness this editorial from Wednesday's USA Today. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 8:58 am by David Rossmiller
  That lack of understanding continues today: witness this editorial from Wednesday's USA Today. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am by Matthew Guariglia
  At first the DOJ took the position that only decisions after passage of USA FREEDOM were covered. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Under the prevailing approach in the US, where YouTube is incorporated, the video would likely be considered a satire, because the copyright work, in this case the original RTS recording, is “a vehicle to poke fun at another target” (as the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit put it in Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997), here). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
The USOC has federally registered a number of trademarks, including RIO 2016 and TEAM USA. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The defamation publication concerned a report about the fatal 2011 Grantham floods. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> USA v. [read post]