Search for: "Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “The cruise line’s argument is that the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, which encompass district courts for the Southern District of Florida, requires that Dunlavy be disqualified from representing Chen. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 12:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Soon after the First Circuit announced its decision in Lycos, the Ninth Circuit went the other way in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Dominion alleges the companies went outside of protected First Amendment activities by giving a platform to false claims about the company and showing little concern for the truth. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Courts have read this immunity broadly, to bar nearly every theory of civil liability that plaintiffs have tried to impose on such companies. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
The Eleventh and Seventh Circuits followed with similar interpretations of the Act, buoying the defense bars in the TCPA plaintiff-heavy federal district courts of Florida and Illinois.[4] California defendants had no such luck. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) Smith & Nephew Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
According to the dissent, that statement is dicta later repudiated in SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]