Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Mr Justice Floyd presided over proceedings -– and he also presided over Schütz v Werit at first instance. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Kevin Stone v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 7:09 am
Floyd, RICO State by State: Guide to Litigation Under the State Racketeering Statutes (2d ed. 2011). [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:39 pm
Stachon v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
Says Floyd J: "Commercial success127. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In a 2-1 decision in Bostic v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
On 18 February 2014, the Court of Appeal (Elias, Lewison and Floyd LJJ) allowed the appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:30 am
This week, among other things, the Office announced it is soliciting public comments on best practices for the mechanical licensing collective to identify owners of unclaimed royalties under the MMA (the announcement was accompanied by a report on collective rights management practices around the world, which could help inform those best practices); it is also seeking public comments on copyright infringement by states and state entities, following the Supreme Court’s… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
If, however, there is some doubt about whether the actual form of compound claimed would result from the described process, it needs to be determined whether following the process would inevitably arrive at the claimed compound.This was the situation in Leo Pharma v Sandoz EWCA Civ 1188, which was decided by Lords Justice Jacob and Patten yesterday (17 November), on appeal from Floyd J's decision in the High Court earlier this year ([2009] EWHC 996 (Pat)). [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 9:00 pm
Lieutenant General Floyd Austin, Convening Authority, the United States Army & the United States, Appellees. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, with Lord Justice Floyd setting out the reasons with which Lord Justices Flaux and Patten agreed. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:32 am
We are happy to report that the court in the case, Arizona Broadcasters Association v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Bayer Consumer Care AG, February 2, 2021, Floyd, H.). [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:53 am
Floyd LJ stated: First, and most importantly, Neurim and Flynn have, and have provided to the court, reasonably detailed forecasts of their expected sales revenues in Periods 1 and 2. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
