Search for: "Ford v. American States Ins." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am by David Whitaker and Shearil Matthews
ADA Background In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA or Act”).[1] The purpose of the Act is to provide protection and certain rights for Americans with disabilities. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm by Deborah Hensler
Ford Professor of Dispute Resolution and Director of Law and Policy LabClass action. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
 See Nixon, 690 S.W.2d at 548-49.The disposition of the affidavit issue mirrors an earlier case involving American Express, in which the defendant, a former Harris County district court judge, had also filed a controverting affidavit, in which he denied having received the cardmember agreement on which the bank moved for summary judgment, and had specially denied that he had consented to the interest rates charged by American Express. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
  As I have written elsewhere, “[a]buses included routine opening and reading of vast amounts of first-class mail and telegrams and drug experiments conducted on unwitting American subjects,” as well as illegal wiretapping, break-ins, infiltration of and covert action attempting to influence domestic political groups. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
”  Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
American Medical Systems, Inc., 958 F. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]