Search for: "Forest Labs. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
Forest Serv., 803 F.3d 809, 815–17 (6th Cir. 2015) (Sutton, J.) [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
” Article 414 further states that: “The State shall adopt adequate and cross-cutting measures for the mitigation of climate change, by limiting greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and air pollution; it shall take measures for the conservation of the forests and vegetation; and it shall protect the population at risk. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
” Forest Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
United States, 2018 U.S. [read post]
4 May 2016, 12:00 am
United States, 432 F.2d 1052 (3d Cir. 1970), and pointing out that, in determining whether all substantial rights to a patent were transferred, the Court must consider not only the terms of the contracts but also the intent of the parties. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Notwithstanding, that claim fails for the simple reason that the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:28 am
’” Forest Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:26 am
Design of the proposal came from a team of United States Proxy Exchange (USPX) members, including James McRitchie, Glyn Holton, Brett Davidson, Steve Neiman, Daniel Rudewicz, Steven Towns and others, with helpful input from a variety of their contacts. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Centers for Disease Control lab. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
Forest Labs., Inc., 527 F.3d 1278, 1291 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
§ 292(b). (6) Forest Group v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
