Search for: "Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
" This is clear content discrimination, since the government can't determine whether movements are "of a sexual nature" without having some revenue officer look at the movements and examine their content. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And just as parade organizers can't be required to pay a security fee that's based on how controversial the parade's message is (Forsyth County v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Greg Lukianoff
Nationalist Movement, writing, "the very existence of some broadly written laws has the potential to chill the expressive activity of others not before the Court. [read post]