Search for: "Forth v. Forth" Results 161 - 180 of 21,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 10:06 am by Securites Lawprof
The Second Circuit recently set forth its view of the nature of a broker's fiduciary duty in affirming the conviction of a broker for his involvement in a pump-and-dump scheme, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 6:31 am by Legal Profession Prof
The New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department affirmed the dismissal of claims against Davis Polk & Wardwell The motion court providently exercised its discretion and properly balanced the factors set forth in Islamic Republic of Iran v... [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:48 pm by JT
Siegel v Landy, 2012 NY Slip Op 03625 (2d Dept. 2012) There is a right to be able to present evidence at an arbitration… “However, as the plaintiff correctly contends, the arbitration award, as modified, *3 should have been vacated on the ground that the arbitrator failed to follow the procedures set forth in CPLR article 75 [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 3:11 am
In this case, the First District certified the following to the Florida Supreme Court as a question of great public importance: DOES THE "TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY" RULE SET FORTH IN CRAWFORD V. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:21 am by David Lat
Is the sniping back and forth between Justice Scalia and Judge Posner personal? [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”).On this rehearing, Soverain has not provided any newinformation concerning the specific limitation of claim 35.The inclusion of an additional known element from asimilar system, as set forth in claim 35, is subject toreview on established principles, as summarized in KSRInternational Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:15 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v Duane Reade (2012 NY Slip Op 05889): The New York Appellate Division has held that 3 emails between a lawyer and a corporate client set forth a fee agreement between the two parties. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:21 pm by Charles Bieneman
Even under the heightened “but-for” materiality standard for proving inequitable conduct in patent prosecution set forth by the Federal Circuit in Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:03 pm
In this appeal, the trial court's decision is affirmed, because the standards and criteria set forth in Baures v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:08 am
The back-and-forth between Jack Balkin, on the one hand, and Matthew Franck and Ed Whalen on the other, over originalism, constitutional meaning, judicial restraint, and abortion continues apace. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:35 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Johnson sets forth numerous grounds for his appeal, all of which are wholly without merit. [read post]