Search for: "Foster v. California" Results 121 - 140 of 755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2007, 4:04 pm
  In California, however, such plans were also possibly unlawful until the California Supreme Court issued its recent decision in Prachasaisoradej v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Christopher McKinney
IKEA Hit with 5 Age Discrimination Lawsuits Alleging the company discriminates against its older employees and fosters a "corporate culture of age bias," IKEA is the target of a newly-filed class action lawsuit (Paine v. [read post]
The bill also would expand coverage of California’s school activities leave (Family School Partnership Act, Labor Code Section 230.8) to include day care facilities and cover child care provider emergencies, and the finding, enrolling, or reenrolling of a child in a school or day care, and would extend protections to an employee who is a step-parent or foster parent or who stands in loco parentis to a child. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
It shares the backstory and legacy of the California Supreme Court’s famous decision in National Audubon Society v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Lawmakers in Congress, California, and other states blamed “the industry structure that tied-house arrangements created . . . . for producing monopolies and exclusive dealing arrangements, for causing a vast growth in the number of saloons and bars, for fostering commercial bribery, and for generating other ‘serious social and political evils,’ including political corruption, irresponsible ownership of retail outlets, and intemperance. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
He resides in Palo Alto, California. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
He resides in Palo Alto, California. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:05 pm by Jack Rubens and Rick Rodriguez
The Decision In a unanimous decision, the California Supreme Court held in Barbara Lynch et al. v. [read post]