Search for: "Frederick Banks v." Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Capitol on January 6th, and How to Prevent it From Happening Again”Expert Statement  Philip Gorski (Frederick and Laura Goff Professor of Sociology and Religious Studies, Yale University)“White Christian Nationalism: The What, When, How and Where. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:39 am by Avery Schmitz
Glasberg & Associates; Cassi Pollreis, client of the Institute for Justice; Houston Stevens, plaintiff in Monroe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:26 am by Kurt R. Karst
Prosecutors in the Western District of Pennsylvania convicted Frederick Banks of wire fraud. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The parties are free, however, to agree to different terms triggering a change in the obligations of the payor spouse,” including the application of a different standard (Matter of Frederick-Kane v Potter, 155 AD3d 1327, 1329 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
At the time, the decedent owned, among other things, two bank accounts held in trust for the decedent’s sons, the plaintiff, Frederick A. [read post]