Search for: "Frenkel v. Frenkel"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
Rick Frenkel, once known as the Troll Tracker and now at Latham & Watkins, LLP , prevailed in the case SYNOPSYS, INC. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:45 am
Documents from Ward v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
Texas (Tyler): Full Albritton v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
In Hoft v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:49 pm
In passing, the holding of New York Times v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:35 am
Yesterday afternoon Cisco issued a statement on resolution of the Albritton v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:58 am
Dennis Crouch at Patently-O (who has written about Frenkel before) has a 16 Sept post on Prometheus Labs. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
Even though Albritton was not a public figure, he ruled, the “actual malice” standard adopted by the Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
Frenkel, then a Cisco in-house lawyer blogging anonymously as the Patent Troll Tracker, wrote two posts about the case, ESN v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:44 am
According to the the case docket in Gregg County District Court (link), the case was originally filed as John Ward, Jr. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:28 pm
[IPBiz: reminds one of what Barstow said of his Schlumberger bosses in the DDB v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 6:45 pm
: Since then, ESN v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:35 pm
(I have longed admired Larry Mantle's work as host of KPCC's AirTalk, and I also read with pleasure Sheera Frenkel's & Cecilia Kang's An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook's Battle for Domination Kindle Edition). [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:58 am
Lemley's "Ending Abuse" showed Lemley does not understand much about continuations (and now we have the decision in Tafas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
Bement & Sons v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 12:45 am
In this subsequent motion, Ward and Albritton say they filed the ESN v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:50 am
Joe Mullin, an IP Law & Business reporter, has an excellent series of posts on his The Prior Art blog discussing the Harris v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
(Frenkel) (3rd Dept., decided 1/29/2009) The New York Court of Appeals' April 2005 decision in Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:51 pm
Harris won't say whether he has any financial interest in the Illinois Computer Research v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
Reports from Tyler are that Albritton v. [read post]
