Search for: "Frye v. Pfizer"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2015, 1:11 pm
Pennsylvania is one of the minority of states that have not adopted Daubert and that ostensibly pay homage to the District of Columbia Circuit’s 1923 Frye decision (Frye v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
Porter v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:32 am
” Likewise, the Court distinguished Frye v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
In re Pfizer Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 185 Misc. 2d 600, 607, 713 N.Y.S.2d 898 (Sup. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
Supp. 1024, 1033 (D.N.J. 1988); Frye v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Preemption, of course, would be The Beatles, and Daubert/Frye the Rolling Stones. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
CVS Pharmacy, 764 N.E.2d 814, 819-20 (Mass. 2002); Frye v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
Applying a robust interpretation of Pennsylvania’s Frye rule, Judge Bernstein excluded Freeman and Cabrera’s proffered testimony, and entered summary judgment for defendant Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661 N.E.2d 352, 354 (Ill. 1996); Frye v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
See Hamilton v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Pfizer, Inc., 196 F. [read post]
