Search for: "Funk v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
This means that Member States might (though they are not obliged to) “address that dynamic concern by granting rightholders ‘rights to receive fuller information’. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 10:18 am
However, the exercise of that freedom may be subject to restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, with regard to (among other things) the rights of others.As a matter of principle, it is important to recall that the ECHR regulates a state's obligations to individuals and does not have a direct effect on the civil liability in proceedings between individuals.When it comes to criminal liability for copyright infringement, the European… [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
Histories of pettitfogging from NPR and Kellen Funk. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:59 am
As readers know, this is a profoundly un-harmonized area of the law, and different approaches are in place across different EU Member States. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am
Following an Advocate General's opinion in January this year, the CJEU were now tasked with clarifying this issue, and handed down their decision not too long ago.As a very brief primer, the case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerned the publication of confidential military reports by Funken online by the daily newspaper Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (having obtained them through unknown means). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am
Following an Advocate General's opinion in January this year, the CJEU were now tasked with clarifying this issue, and handed down their decision not too long ago.As a very brief primer, the case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerned the publication of confidential military reports by Funken online by the daily newspaper Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (having obtained them through unknown means). [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Although it has been admitted by the NIKE legal representatives that Kawhi Leonard had submitted a design, they have gone on to state that it is a false claim that the design was the “Claw” design, as reported in the Bulletin. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 5:28 am
In Murphy Land Group LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:54 am
Notes 1 United Cannabis Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
Parker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 am
We found out the precursor to the European answer to this question late last October.The case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany concerned military status reports drawn up for the German government on a weekly basis, which detail developments of deployed forces abroad. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 am
We found out the precursor to the European answer to this question late last October.The case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany concerned military status reports drawn up for the German government on a weekly basis, which detail developments of deployed forces abroad. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17; Funke Medien (Case C-469/17) (Advocate General Opinion 25 October 2018 here) and Pelham Case 476/17); and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH… [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:25 pm
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17; Funke Medien (Case C-469/17) (Advocate General Opinion 25 October 2018 here) and PelhamCase 476/17); and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17). [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
