Search for: "GAD v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Last post, we discussed Gad v Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 34357(U) December 20, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156841/2021 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:37 am
Thank you to the reader who recently alerted me to this important opinion: Campasano v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 3:50 am
Mainiero, 31 A.D.3d 306, 306 [1st Dept. 2006] (reversing dismissal under CPLR § 321 l(a)(l) “[d]espite the detailed on-the-record settlement of plaintiffs matrimonial action,” on the grounds that “the former husband’s pension and other assets were overlooked in arriving at the stipulation”); Gad v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
Declining the employee’s request to overrule Jones, the appeals court looked to its subsequent decision in Gad v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:00 am
Gad v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 10:25 am
Sports Illustrated, et al., 2:13-cv-10226-GAD-DRG (E.D. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:24 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
In Dastar v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:39 am
The argument is scheduled for 1000 in front of Judges Tozzi, Sims, and Gallagher in the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 3:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
" Stalley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:23 am
An interesting little puzzle: if a public entity and a "gad-fly" advocacy group enter into a settlement agreement whereby the gad-fly will not address any further challenges to the public entity's conduct that he originally challenged through litigation, will a later complaint by the public entity for the breach of that settlement agreement against the gad-fly be precluded by the Minnesota anti-SLAPP statute? [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:43 pm
See 58 M.J. at 397; see also United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:08 am
" The very first example the cert petition offers of such extra-statutory expansion is United States v. [read post]
