Search for: "GI HOLDINGS INC." Results 21 - 40 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Biolitec, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) CAFC: Successor company holds patents assigned to predecessor company (even if assigned after predecessor dissolved): Tri-Star Electronics Int’l. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray on… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(Plameco) (EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Cease and desist declaration only binding to the parties, not a natural or legal person signing on behalf of one of the parties: Metaco Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Do you think London cabs have such a distinctive character enough to hold a trade mark? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Tomorrow's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to tackle trade secrets theftAs the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary is holding a hearing on "Protecting Trade Secrets:  the Impact of Trade Secret Theft on American Competitiveness and Potential Solutions to Remedy this Harm", Annsley reports on the current status of the trade secrets reform in the US – and beyond. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
Mark takes a look at another text (in German), the latter being Sebastian Fuchs' dissertation Das Europäische Patent im Wandel - Ein Rechtsvergleich des EP-Systems und des EU-Patentsystems (ie, "The Changing European Patent - A comparison of the EP system and the EU patent package"). * Fordham 2016: Copyright and trade mark - what does the future hold? [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
 Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] –  Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Schachtman
It is thus refreshing to see the Ninth Circuit hold that California’s law of duty to warn applies to only to known or knowable risks. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]