Search for: "GIVEN v. OWEN" Results 61 - 80 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
While it is not binding, it sets out a clear position which, given the involvement of Minos Perdios in the review decision, could well be of broader relevance. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
While it is not binding, it sets out a clear position which, given the involvement of Minos Perdios in the review decision, could well be of broader relevance. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:12 pm by David Ryan
Judge John Owens, joined by Judges Barry Silverman and Consuelo Callahan, wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment but rejecting the majority’s conclusion that it could remedy future PCA violations through suppression of evidence. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The court rejected several claims Neovasc had made concerning the trade secret instructions given to the jury. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:37 am by Jason Rantanen
Christopher Cotropia is a Professor of Law and the Austin Owen Research Fellow at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court disagreed and rejected this branch of Member’s appeal.In Owens v McGuire, 121 AD2d 292, the Appellate Division said that the doctrine of estoppel can only be applied “against a governmental entity if failure to apply the doctrine would defeat a right legally and rightfully obtained. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
This is not a matter in relation to which the defendants have had an opportunity properly to consider their position and it appears they may already have given substantial disclosure in the course of the main proceedings. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
” It is not a given that any further proceedings would be “proper,” given the court’s definitive ruling, albeit on a threshold question about the preliminary injunction. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 5:00 pm
Specifically, such appeals involve unsettled issues regarding the mitigation instructions given to jurors, says Owen, co-director of the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas School of Law. [read post]