Search for: "GMBH"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 4:25 am
Viele Abmahnungen aus Deutschland stammen von Anwaltskollege Jan Denecke in Berlin, beispielsweise im Auftrag der WENN GmbH. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 4:57 pm
Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Nicholas Caddick KC) EnOcean GmbH v Far Eastern Manufacturing Ltd and another [2023] EWHC 2615 (IPEC) (24 Oct 2023)This was an action for the infringement of claims 1 and 3 of European patent (UK) 1 611 663 B3 by the importation into, and marketing in, the UK of a product called the Quinetic Wireless Switch and a [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
On Septemeber 15, 2011, an Indiana United States District Court found that a reasonable jury could find that employee, a 63-year old employee at Knauf GmbH (“Knauf”), a German company, was terminated because of his age and his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
On Septemeber 15, 2011, an Indiana United States District Court found that a reasonable jury could find that employee, a 63-year old employee at Knauf GmbH (“Knauf”), a German company, was terminated because of his age and his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
On November 3, 2011, a United States District Court in Louisiana denied Norddeutsche Seekabelwerke GmbH’s (“NSW”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:18 am
There are dozens of federal lawsuits captioned “Emoji Company GmbH v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:06 am
Usedsoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp (Case C-128/11); [2012] WLR (D) 192 “Article 4(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2009/24/EC meant that the right of distribution of a copy of a computer program was exhausted if the copyright holder who had authorised, even free of charge, the downloading of that copy from the Internet onto a data carrier had also conferred, in return for payment of a fee intended to enable him to obtain a remuneration corresponding to the economic value… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:29 pm
Falk Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:56 am
Football Dataco Ltd and others v Sportradar GmbH and another [2011] EWCA Civ 330; [2011] WLR (D) 113 “There was no good arguable case of copyright infringement under article 3 of Directive 96/9/EC such as to establish that the English court had jurisdiction for the purposes of article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 where, even though the collection of data might involve some intellectual creation, what was alleged to have been copied was mere data on any reasonable view. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
Finanzamt Burgdorf v Bog; CinemaxX Entertainment GmbH & Co KG v Finanzamt; Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst; Lohmeyer v Finanzamt Minden; Fleischerei Nier GmbH & Co KG v Finanzamt Detmold (Joined Cases C? [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:36 pm
Walter GmbH sought a trademark on the James Bond Walter PPK:The mark consists of the three-dimensional configuration of a pistol. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:54 am
Danfoss Flensburg GmbH; 12/19/2011 06:35 AM EST; Hier die relevanten Daten, lehrreich für deutsche Unternehmen in ähnlichen Situationen, die vom US-Justizministerium wegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkung (conspiracy to restrain trade) angeklagt werden: Danfoss ; Weitere Informationen . [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:56 am
Enercon GmbH. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:48 am
Gebr Weber GmbH v Wittmer Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH Joined cases C-65/09 and C-87/09; [2011] WLR (D) 210 “Where consumer goods, installed in good faith by the consumer, were not in conformity with the contract under which the consumer had purchased and and were restored to conformity by way of replacement, the seller was obliged pursuant to article 3(2)(3) of Parliament and Council Directive 1999/44/EC either to remove the goods from where they had been installed and… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:58 am
Broda Agro Trade (Cyprus) Ltd v Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH [2010] EWCA Civ 1100; [2010] WLR (D) 246 “A party who had been named in arbitration proceedings could simply ignore the arbitration proceedings if he considered that he had not entered into the agreement and come to court to challenge the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal; but if he had taken part in the proceedings disputing the jurisdiction of the court or the tribunal’s exercise of their asserted… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 am
Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v Silva Trade SA (Case C-19/09); [2010] WLR (D) 77 “Where services were provided in several member states of the European Union, the court which had jurisdiction to hear and determine all the claims arising from the contract was the court in whose jurisdiction the place of the main provision of services was situated. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:54 am
eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10); [2011] WLR (D) 330 “Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was established or before the… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:19 am
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (Case C-529/07); [2009] WLR (D) 182 “The fact that, at the time of applying for registration of a sign as a trade mark, the applicant knew or was to be taken as knowing that an identical or similar sign capable of being confused with the applicant's sign [...] [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (Case C-119/10); [2012] WLR (D) 20 “A service provider who, under an order from and on the instructions of another person, filled packaging which was supplied to it by the other person who, in advance, affixed to it a sign which was identical with, or similar to, a sign protected as a trade mark did not itself make use of the sign that was liable to be prohibited under that provision.” WLR Daily, 15th December 2012 Source:… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Nokia Oyj (Nokia Corpn) v IPCom GmbH & Co KG: [2011] EWHC 2719 (Pat); [2011] WLR (D) 303 “Section 63(2) of the Patents Act 1977 was not intended to act as a sanction against careless drafting or lack of good faith when those matters had no bearing on the damages or other remedy sought by the patentee.” WLR Daily, 26th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
