Search for: "GOODWIN v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:02 pm
 Judge Trott, joined by Judge Goodwin, fully agrees with everything Judge Fletcher says. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The aggrieved employee has the burden of proving that his or her employee organization’s action, or inaction, breached its “Duty of Fair Representation” DeOliveira v New York State Pub. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:27 pm by Jon Sands
  No, holds the 9th, because the state of the law at the time the state court decided the case was Oregon v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:14 am by Steve Statsinger
As summer draws to a close, here are two more summary orders of interest.In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am by webmaster
  The hearing also covered rest break issues implicated by Brinkley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm by Jon Sands
And under AEDPA, the state's interpretation was unreasonable.Thompson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:34 am by Sean Wajert
  Judge Goodwin issued Pretrial Order (PTO) No. 47, which assigned the following five cases for trial, in this order:  • David Kelch, et al. v. [read post]