Search for: "GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES v. US "
Results 1 - 20
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2008, 10:35 pm
Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
The KSR court characterized the “known-technique” rationale by holding “if a technique has been used to improve one device, and a person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that it would improve similar devices in the same way, using the technique is obvious unless its actual application is beyond his or her skill. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:42 am
" Magna Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:10 am
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 417 (2007), “if a technique has been used to improve one device, and a person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that it would improve similar devices in the same way, using the technique is obvious unless its actual application is beyond his or her skill. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
” Knight Institute, slip op. at 10-11.[2] The State Department redacted various version of FAM 302.6, entitled “Ineligibilities Based on Terrorism Related Grounds. [read post]
Radar-based target determination method claims saved from Alice by improvement arguments at the PTAB
9 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
" The appellants were also able to point to support in their specification for a new assertion that the rejected independent claim "improves upon the technical field of position determination with SAR images by reducing error in the known techniques".Answering the argument that the conventional pre-solution steps could not be performed in the human mind, the examiner cited CyberSource Corp. v. [read post]
Radar-based target determination method claims saved from Alice by improvement arguments at the PTAB
9 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
" The appellants were also able to point to support in their specification for a new assertion that the rejected independent claim "improves upon the technical field of position determination with SAR images by reducing error in the known techniques".Answering the argument that the conventional pre-solution steps could not be performed in the human mind, the examiner cited CyberSource Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Thus the dismissal on those grounds cannot stand.The Arbitrator also concluded that the School District had not established that grievant had used excessive force when dealing with students. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:53 am
The Board concluded that the improvement lay in the processing of data to achieve a more accurate weather forecast, i.e. an improved model using a scientific theory, which could contribute to technical character.The appeal was dismissed. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 1:36 pm
For the technique’s use to be obvious, theskilled artisan need only be able to recognize, based onher background knowledge, its potential to improve thedevice and be able to apply the technique. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm
It also provides hints at improving ones patent drafting technique. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:02 am
For the same reason, if a technique has been used to improve one device, and a person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that it would improve similar devices in the same way, using the technique is obvious unless its actual application is beyond his or her skill. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 8:37 am
Enco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
In 2002, the Bush administration cited as justification for its adoption of enhanced interrogation techniques the 1978 European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) decision in Ireland v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Krishna and Musso’sexperiments, Medicines discovered that the Asp9 level ofbatches compounded using the improved “efficient mixing”process never exceeded 0.6 percent. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:36 pm
Related Cases: Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:28 pm
Machines Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
A number of scents can evoke clear memories and feelings.Kat-noseAnother hurdle may be the extension of some absolute grounds for exclusion from registration that used to refer only to shapes and now include any ‘other characteristic’ (Trade Marks Directive, art 4(1)(e). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:26 pm
For all those who hoped the Supreme Court would use this case tooffer clarity, well, there's always next time.Bilski v. [read post]
