Search for: "GS v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The most notable cases from national courts are Subafilms, Ltd. v MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
The judgment was delivered by the special bench of the High Court, consisting of Justices GS Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale, in Shivangi Agarwal & Ors. v. the Union of India & Ors. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
More on the Swedish application of GS MediaFollowing the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in GS Media [Kat-coverage here] there have been applications of this ruling at the level of Swedish [here] and German [here and here] courts. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
After, what felt like a small eternity to this writer, the CJEU has released its judgment on the case yesterday.The case of GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV dealt with pictures of Britt Dekker (a famous Dutch TV personality), commissioned by Sanoma Media for publication in Playboy magazine. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:27 pm
This is the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to consider in Magyar Jeti Zrt v Hungary. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
Seeking an ArrowArrow declarations can be granted: Fujifilm v AbbVieGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy discusses Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1, which involves two appeals, both raising the question of whether a Court can grant a so called ‘Arrow declaration’, i.e. a declaration that “a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date”.Guest Post - China's Patent BoomYangjin Li… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am by Eleonora Rosati
”Sui generis decisionsSecondly, as mentioned above, the Opinion considers GS Media, Filmspeler, and Ziggo as belonging to a sui generis group of decisions. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
| BREAKING NEWS Brexit - High Court rules Government cannot Invoke Article 50 under Crown Prerogative | Canada's new approach to diagnostic practices prompts division at CIPONever Too Late 120 [week ending on Sunday 30 October] | Court of Appeal on Pregabalin - Pfizer still in pain, but Swiss claims re-interpreted again | Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for Health | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part two) | AG Szpunar says… [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 11:25 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
OPM Plum Book: Every four years, just after the Presidential election, the “United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions” is published. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
 | Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:38 pm
  Officially know as the United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions, this publication is compiled every four years, following the Presidential election. [read post]