Search for: "GUNNING v GENERAL MOTORS CORP" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2007, 2:30 pm
Some might argue that with these decisions, common sense has ultimately prevailed.For full text of the two Supreme Court of Canada decisions see:Citadel General Assurance Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Bexis
  After reviewing the evidence . . . we hold the evidence of conscious indifference is not legally sufficient.General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 739 (1978). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
First Quality Baby Products (Gray on Claims) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Pet-door patent dispute over jurisdiction clarified: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
General Motors Corp., 271 F.3d 583, 590 (4th Cir. 2001). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  We took a look, but first we had to eliminate those states that, for one reason or another, generally preclude punitive damages, allowing drug and device manufacturers to enjoy The Day of the Dove in common-law cases. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-357, the managing partner of a venture capital fund started threatening to tell the wife of the New York Comptroller General that he was cheating on her if the Comptroller General did not invest in his fund. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this subsection upon proof of a violation of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:29-2 or while operating a motor vehicle in violation of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:20-10 which resulted in bodily injury to another person; or (7) Attempts to cause significant bodily injury to another or causes significant bodily injury purposely or knowingly or, under circumstances manifesting extreme… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Electrolux Motor, AB, 844 F.2d 769 (11th Cir. 1988). [read post]