Search for: "Garcia v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:29 am
Although both parties attempted to rely upon the court’s earlier decision upholding the constitutionality of the ordinance, Garcia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:42 am
These cases will most likely be prosecuted on the Essex County Superior Court in Salem, Massachusetts. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:15 am
In Washington this is fatal.The case is Knight v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Oral argument was held the following day before a panel of this Court. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Exchange (1991) 231 CA3d 481, Garcia v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am
Regarding the contract formation, the court starts off strongly by citing the Nguyen v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association, 493 U.S. 411 (1990) and NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
June 26, 2007) (declining to exercise jurisdiction after dismissing class allegations); Garcia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
See Townsley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
Mackenzie, also decided by the Superior Court (Judge Garsh). [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am
., Garcia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The Supreme Court of Canada finally upped Robinson’s total award from the $2.7 million figure set by the Quebec Court of Appeal, but without restoring it fully to the $5.2 million awarded by Superior Court Judge Claude Auclair in 2009. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Superior Essex Inc. et al. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:51 am
A report by the receiver in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
I’m assuming he meant the FDIC, but what do I know, that’s what the court documents said, the FTC. [read post]
