Search for: "Garrido v. State"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
In Garrido v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Garrido was classified as a high-risk sex offender after he served a federal prison sentence for kidnapping a Nevada woman in 1976, but the report states federal probation officers "failed to supervise him accordingly" despite Garrido's questionable behavior, problematic psychological reports, and dirty urine samples. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:54 am
In the Extradition of Nunez-Garrido, S.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:24 pm
Ventura, Prosecutor v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
" See Garrido v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:07 am
Garrido-Santana, 360 F.3d 565, 576 (6th Cir. 2004); United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:42 am
Garrido-Santana, 360 F.3d 565, 576 (6th Cir. 2004); United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
S. 312, 327 (1986) (same); United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:09 am
State, 2007 Ga. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:39 am
Contents include:The Classics’ CornerRoberto Mesa Garrido, From the City of God to Universal Chaos General ArticlesAntonio A. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:30 pm
One of the latest defendants to have their arbitration provision deemed unenforceable is Air Liquide in Garrido v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:27 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jason Burnam v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 8:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:24 pm
Gómez, Gilberto Guerrero-Rocca, Nicolás Vassallo, María Gabriela De Abreu Negrón, Karen Longaric, & Fabián Villeda Corona, Revisión de laudos arbitrales de inversión 2020: 2º Encuentro Anual (Santiago de Chile, 07-08/06/2021) Lucas Carlos Lima, As medidas cautelares da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso Ucrânia e Federação Russa Eshan Dauhoo, The Challenges faced by Women Legal Academics (Panel Discussion) … [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
But see DeLuca v. [read post]
