Search for: "Garrison v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
” The foreign government must have adopted “procedures to minimize the acquisition, retention and dissemination of information concerning United States persons subject to the agreement. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:08 am
Today [October 5, 2015], the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the petition for a writ of certiorari (the “Petition”) filed by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, the subject of two earlier posts today, was argued December 1, 2014, and decided today, exactly six months later. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1094 n.14 (8th Cir. 1973) (likewise); Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies 1043-45 (4th ed. 2011); Laurence Tribe, Constitutional Law, §12-17, at 926; Toni M. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
The district court was not clearly erroneous in finding that although Hurtado may have been a cog in some larger wheel, he was an essential cog who, solely for a sizeable sum of money, knowingly smuggled a large quantity of narcotics into the United States via a hidden compartment in his truck. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
All records on the Device described in Attachment A that reference or relate to violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 175 . . . and involve DANIEL HARRY MILZMAN, including: a. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  And given the very recent ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am by Ronald Collins
Peters, editor, Precedent in the United States Supreme Court (Springer, February 2014) Wendy Scott & Linda S. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm by David Kopel
The Supreme Court’s 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School:  A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]