Search for: "Gary L. Smith v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
For publication opinions today (3): Smith & Wesson Corp., et al & United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
Today the same Kat has been correcting the proofs of an article on patent litigation forum-shopping by the McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP pair of Gary Moss and Robert Lundie Smith. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest story in the world this week was of course the election of Donald Trump as the next President of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
May 14, 2010)(O'Neill) (civil forfeiture case, truck driver failed to show entitlement to money hidden in truck and unclaimed byowner)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. $281,420.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00158-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-03-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.Justice O'Neill delivered the opinion of the Court [pdf]View E-Briefs in No. 08-0465 THE… [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm by Tyler S St Cyr
  While there isn’t any uniform method of analysis among the courts, the United States Supreme Court set out a guidepost in Monel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]