Search for: "General Box Co. v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:34 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
Class action litigation over food product labels is rapidly emerging around the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The Law: Conspiracies to Defraud the United States The federal government’s general conspiracy statute is set forth in Title 18 of the United States Code at section 371, making it a crime for two or more people to conspire “to defraud the United States or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” [emphasis added]—John Irwin, Prisons in Turmoil (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
   If the United States government can encrypt its data, so can China, or the Russian mob, or a Mexican drug cartel. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am by Miriam Seifter
 All agree, the Court says, that under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm by Bruce Boyden
But none of those would apply here, at least not under the assumption that the blog host and blog contributors are all located in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]