Search for: "General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Martinez"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Martinez testified that although the precise numbers fluctuate, the percentages in the four-month sample period were generally reflective of the population of vehicles the MVD monitors for any given period.State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
These allegations, which must be accepted as true on a motion to dismiss (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87), are sufficient to state a cause of action (see NWE Corp v Atomic Risk Management, 25 AD3d 349 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 4:34 pm
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
That hypothesis must, of course, then be tested and supported by appropriate analytical methods before it can be accepted for general causation and as a putative specific cause in a particular individual. 3. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
"On a CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss, the court will accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory" (Nonnon v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
General Motors Corp. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court—the case is called UJ-Eighty Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
With regard to financial records, the "Additional Provisions" required Miracle Star to prepare and maintain a written cost allocation plan, and complete financial records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and the COLA Department of Health Services Abuse Program Contract Financial Handbook. [read post]
