Search for: "General Public Utilities Corp. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:16 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
Public Records, Public University and Sexual Assault – Which Laws Hold Sway?: By S. Dean Michaux, JD
24 Jun 2020, 8:37 am
Utilities Comm’n v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In or around 2000, Alice Kimble hired Steven Weinstein, a certified public accountant licensed in New York, to prepare her federal and New York state income tax returns. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted an all-time high 219,614 United States utility patents in 2010 – up 31 percent over 2009. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:33 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The “argument grounded in jurisprudence” concerns developments in the United States and the Commonwealth (at [66] et seq.). [read post]
Citing Third Party Disclosure, Court Rules Attorney-Client Privilege does not Protect Certain Emails
9 May 2019, 7:30 am
On May 6, 2019, however, the United States District Court Southern District of New York ruled that attorney-client communications, in the form of emails, shared with a public relations firm were neither privileged nor protected by attorney work-product doctrine. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Christopher v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
The court stated that claim construction implies construing the use of drafting techniques (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:58 am
While recognizing that such floor statementsare typically not reliable as indicators of congressionalintent, see, e.g., Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
