Search for: "Georgia Pacific, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 2:51 pm
Today is foreclosure day, so time to review the Chapter 11 filings for the last month in the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
Info-Hold, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:05 pm
Alexsam, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:24 am
Plaintiff notes that [its own] expert report does not disclose the full terms or circumstances of the [agreement], and points out that the report states that [plaintiff's expert] was unable to draw any meaningful conclusions from [the agreement] under the Georgia-Pacific analysis. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:06 am
We need not identify any particular Georgia-Pacific factor as being dispositive. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 5:37 am
Pacific Cycle, Inc. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 5:37 am
Pacific Cycle, Inc. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 6:29 pm
Georgia–Pacific LLC. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:44 am
Jan. 26, 2007):Halliburton sued Georgia-Pacific and Milwhite for cost recovery and contribution under Section 107(a) of CERCLA. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:00 am
(Santa Fe Pacific Gold Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:14 pm
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:59 am
Pacific Time. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
The motion was jointly filed by Complainant Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (“Georgia-Pacific”), Respondents Draco Hygienic Products, Inc., Kruger Products LP, KTG USA LP, New Choice (H.K.) [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
I believe Georgia-Pacific doesn't work well for FRAND royalties because simulating a negotiation between two parties would allow patentees to capture post-standardization hold-up value. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
Georgia Pacific Consumer Products LP v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:20 am
In this opinion, the Court weighed the Georgia Pacific factors and held that they warranted a royalty rate of 20%. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 8:09 pm
An industry group, the Stryrene Information and Research Center Inc. filed a federal lawsuit against the decision but this was thrown out, yet two years ago, industry groups persuaded Congress to appropriate funds for the National Academy of Sciences to review the NTP's report. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:45 pm
Only Georgia-Pacific and the Commission investigative attorney timely filed submissions. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:05 am
" Whether characterized as applying the Georgia-Pacific factors or imagining conducting a hypothetical negotiation, the process, the Court wrote, is one and the same. [read post]
