Search for: "Georgia Power Co. v. Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 9:04 am by Eric Goldman
We accordingly conclude plaintiff’s Facebook comment is not protected by the First Amendment. * Baker-Rhett v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am by William Ford
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck dissected the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Douglas wrote: “Books must serve as powerful agencies of social, economic, or political reform. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
David Baker, chair of Baker Robbins & Co., provides better queries for a healthier, more productive conversation. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
The task of funding government services belongs to the legislature, not the courts:[This] is a proper subject for Congressional action, not for any creative power of ours. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
After concluding that the cyber “attacks” against the nation of Georgia in 2008 did not constitute “armed attack” under current definitions of the term in the law of war, a report from the NATO Co–operative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE) concluded that “new approaches to traditional LOAC [law of armed conflict] principles need to be developed. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The co-director of a Bristol-based magazine publisher has accused the Daily Telegraph of exploiting his criminal past to “attack” and “undermine”press regulator Impress. [read post]