Search for: "German v. AC & S, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9) the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 1:00 am
In the case of Riad v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
* Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were never consultedAs Eponia Emperor’s Mr Battistelli presents to Board 28 an updated proposal addressed to the AC, the Boards’ Praesidium writes to the AC members in frustration, disputing that they were properly consulted, and asking for their voices to be heard. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
Here she starts with The Making of the TRIPS Agreement, published by the WTO, 2015, and edited by Jayashree Watal and Antony Taubman.* LG Mannheim: there is no German balsamicoMark reports on an interesting (and quite astonishing) German decision addressing the possible infringement of the “Aceto Balsamico di Modena” geographical indication by a German company using “Balsamico” vinegar.* Are the DTSA's ex parte seizure powers… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:31 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 76 [week ending on Sunday 13 December] – The Making of the TRIPS Agreement | German Balsamico?! [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
As Shalini Bengani explains in this post,TufAmerica Inc v W B Music Corp 13-cv-7847(LAK), decided by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, is another one of those cases. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731) Lord Diplock established five criteria for a claim of extended passing off. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Hyundai Motor America, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court S D California: False marking affirmative defenses – Laches & unclean hands are in, advice of Counsel is out: Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
The name of the game is to match the hair to the IP personality.* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Lilly ADHD dispute (Part I)* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Eli Lilly ADHD dispute (Part II)Annsley reports on the brand spanking new specialist Patents Court judge Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2015] EWHC. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The letter's author is a well-known litigator and is a partner in the renowned German firm of Bardehle Pagenberg. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
Never too late 37 [week ending Sunday 15 March] - EPO v EPO’s staff | EPO’s Board of Appeal’s reform | Unitary Patent’s fees | Pinterest’s Community Trade Mark pinned down | Australian compulsory licences | Is COMFYBALLS trade mark offensive? [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
(See, e.g., Qualcomm, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Ace Hardware Corp. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
Here's a hint: one of them authored the Court of Appeals' 2008 5-2 majority opinion in the first-party property insurance groundbreaking decision in Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
