Search for: "Gibbs v. Day et al" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Schachtman
In the meta-analyses of studies of occupational asbestos exposure, the summary risk estimates were well below two.[14] [1]  See “Serpentine subgroup,” in Wikipedia. [2]  Lester Breslow, et al., Asbestiform Fibers: Nonoccupational Health Risks at 7 (Nat’l Research Council 1984). [3]  Appellants’ Brief at 38, in Ingham v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:36 am by Ron Coleman
 Here’s the last paragraph of the story, which refers to the earlier dismissal of the Harjo case on laches grounds: 2012: Another lawsuit to get rid of the team name, Blackhorse et al v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
” Kohn and Sanjour battled the EPA for four years, and on May 30, 1995, in a case that impacted every government employee, the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, in William Sanjour et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Distressingly, criminal cases in Ontario are only dismissed for “excessive” delay when they fail to reach trial within thirty months[12] (which is three times longer than it takes on average for similar felonies to be resolved in New York City, which is itself above the statewide target of 180 days[13]). [read post]