Search for: "Giles v. Little" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr D was there and his wife a little distance away. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham City Council v Wilson [2016] EWCA Civ 1137 In Pieretti v Enfield LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 (our note) the Court of Appeal held that under (the predecessor to) the Equality Act, in the course of Housing Act 1997 Part VII inquiries, a reviewing officer was required to carry out inquiries into an applicant’s disability that the Housing Act 1996 had not previously required, i.e. where the applicant had not raised the issue but the reviewing… [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe that doesn’t work today, though Samsung argued that other parts of the statute were outdated.Christopher Burrell, Director & Senior Counsel, Samsung Electronics: Quoting Giles Rich, “the name of the game is the claim. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:27 pm by Giles Peaker
So, on to MA Lloyd & Son Ltd v PPC International Ld (t/a Professional Powercraft) [2016] EWHC 2162 (QB) in which we find PPC seeking wasted costs orders against Roderick McCarthy, following the usual spectacularly bad and incompetent litigation against PPC by Charles Henry ‘acting’ for MA Lloyd – in this instance, 3 failed claims, multiple failed appeals of orders and unpaid costs orders at the time MA became insolvent. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
City West Housing Trust v Massey [2016] EWCA Civ 704 When considering a suspended possession order, how should the judge exercise their discretion where the tenant’s evidence has been disbelieved, in whole or part? [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
The decision letter addressed the Mohammed criteria (R v Camden LBC exp Mohammed (1997) 30 HLR 315). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm by Giles Peaker
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
There would be little prospect of abuse by including them within the defined categories in Regulation B13 and little need for monitoring. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
  Each of these efforts succumbed, however, to forces unleashed by Cruikshank and immunized by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, most prominently Giles v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am by Giles Peaker
Our client experiences significant discomfort aggravated by poor sleeping arrangements, little to no food or liquid. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 6:53 am by Giles Peaker
There has been very little downsizing, with many unable to downsize. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by chief
” He was a little worried about this. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
Ooops. by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 1:05 pm by Giles Peaker
The decision by the First-Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in the case of Roberts v Keegan (REF/2012/1006, REC/2013/0041) [Not available online yet], about the enforcement of a rentcharge, may seem a little obscure, but I think it is of interest. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 am by JB
  And our bitterest critique seems to come, as noted before, in Chapter Eight, where pretty much every major decision of the Court -- Bradwell, The Civil Rights Cases, Plessy, Giles, Berea College, Buck v. [read post]