Search for: "Gill v. US" Results 101 - 120 of 599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
At least some of the justices, he suggests, have “a reluctance — even an allergy — to taking math and statistics seriously,” as evidenced most recently by their questions and comments at the Oct. 3 oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Gill v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The recent case of Claydon v Mzuri is a particularly harsh example of the application of the prior use case law. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Supp. 740, 785, 836 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) (“A government administrative agency may regulate or prohibit the use of toxic substances through rulemaking, despite a very low probability of any causal relationship. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
"DA Connick left a dirty legacy," is James Gill's column in the Sunday New Orleans Times-Picayune. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm by Samuel Bray
But A's case is not a judgment in C's case; A's remedy is not a remedy for C (see, e.g., Gill v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:46 pm
Gill explains:As a postscript to this 1709 Blog post late last year on Scottish Professional Football League Limited (SPFL) v Lisini Pub Management Co Limited (2013) CSIH 97 -- this being the Scottish version of Football Association Premier League Limited and Others v QC Leisure and Others (No. 2), a.k.a the FAPL case -- the Scottish Appeal Court decided last week to refuse leave to appeal to the UK Supreme Court.To recap: SPFL’s appeal of the first instance… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
  But if the court were to follow its strict approach to standing (see most recently Gill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers continue to discuss the Supreme Court’s recent announcement that it will hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]