Search for: "Gill v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Tansey v Gill [2012] 1 IR 26, [2012] IEHC 42 (31 January 2012) provides an excellent example of the second tendency. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:21 pm by Ben Cheng
The petition of the day is: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:48 pm by Joseph Falcon
United States, 160 U.S. 426, 16 S.Ct. 322, 40 L.Ed. 480 (1896). [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:49 am by NCC Staff
At the same time, there is a similar case about Pennsylvania redistricting in the federal court system, and the United States Supreme Court is considering a possible landmark gerrymandering decision from Wisconsin in Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
Roberts also observed in Gill that the Supreme Court looked at this issue in 2006 in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:35 am by Peter Howard Tilem
Gill, the United States Court of Appeals struck down the seven round load limit finding it violated the Second Amendment but left the 10 round magazine capacity limit in place. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:35 am by Peter Howard Tilem
Gill, the United States Court of Appeals struck down the seven round load limit finding it violated the Second Amendment but left the 10 round magazine capacity limit in place. [read post]
8 May 2010, 3:03 pm by Betsy McKenzie
GLAD is representing plaintiffs challenging the DOMA (federal Defense of Marriage Act) in the federal district court in Boston, the case, Gill v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports on the upcoming term’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:47 pm
From yesterday's Wall Street Journal editorial page covering yesterday's oral arguments in Gill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:47 pm
From yesterday's Wall Street Journal editorial page covering yesterday's oral arguments in Gill v. [read post]