Search for: "Given v. Wright" Results 161 - 180 of 847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It was made especially shocking given those accused of her murder were two teenage girls. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:09 pm
Breaking these rules can land the defendant back in prison, as the defendant discovered in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:50 pm by Chip Merlin
P. 1; see 5C, WRIGHT & MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1360, at 78 (3d ed. 2004) ("[A]lthough a given motion might raise a valid point, unless its determination would have the effect of promoting 'the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination' of the action as mandated by Rule 1, the district court should probably deny the application and thereby avoid any delay. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Sullivan, a partner at Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae LLP, who is the lawyer of Kevin Morris (who is the lawyer for Hunter Biden). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is what the Court of Appeals wants to know:  (1) why, given the evidence on the record, there is no genuine issue of material fact about whether Dr. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:42 pm
Given that "ailerons" were a known wing element BEFORE the Wrights, was the Wright's invention "obvious to try" on March 23, 1903? [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The ICO believes that the leaked images given to The Sun were obtained by someone recording CCTV footage screens with a mobile phone. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am by INFORRM
The Lord Chief Justice drew attention to Lord Diplock’s comments in Wright v British Railways Board [1983] 2 AC 773 that the Court of Appeal is “generally speaking the tribunal best qualified to set guidelines for judges trying such actions” particularly given the “inescapably artificial and conventional nature of the assessment of damages for non-economic loss”. [read post]