Search for: "Givens v. Quinn"
Results 121 - 140
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:09 am
Let there be no doubt that Quinn Emanuel's Dr. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm
Quinn:"Up to this point, I think Apple really hadn't given up hope [it] could cripple Android somehow. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
”) After his second complaint to Quinn, however, Gill testifies that Quinn “went over the top. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
Quinn (2014). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
Quinn POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:02 am
A few days before the Apple v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:56 am
So why didn't Governor Lingle just appoint Justice Recktenwald as CJ in the first place instead of the relatively unknown Judge Leonard, given that he was considered a "shoo-in? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:03 am
Apple says that damages-only retrials, such as in Uniloc v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
In re Anthony,414 F.2d 1383 (CCPA 1969) (FDA, not USPTO, is responsible for safety ofdrugs which are sought to be patented); In re Watson, 517 F.2d 465 (CCPA1975) (Congress has given responsibility to FDA, not USPTO, to determinein the first instance whether drugs are safe); Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 3:45 am
Azeka Building Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:26 am
Google is represented by Quinn Emanuel.Google really wanted to win this one. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
The court ordered that every man be given a hearing, and a written explanation of the reason he was sent to Tamms. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am
Google's Motorola Mobility, represented by Quinn Emanuel, scored a surprise win over a Microsoft patent yesterday at the Munich-based Bundespatentgericht (Federal Patent Court of Germany). [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm
After, say, a 40% gross contingency fee (which is probably on the high end, given the massive damages both Mattel and Quinn thought they could get, but which is common in commercial and business litigation) and costs, that would leave Mattel with about $20-24 million, or less than 5% of their annual profit. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 9:13 am
In addition to various courts, the Securities and Exchange Commission may avail itself of this procedure, and did so in the case of CA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:30 am
This was the situation that arose in the case of Thenga v Quinn [2009] EWCA Civ 151 (Lawtel link). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am
Yesterday, David Quinn of the Iona Institute tweeted that the judgment was little more than a minor propaganda victory for the pro-choice lobby. [read post]
