Search for: "Goldstein v. California"
Results 201 - 220
of 560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
Percy, in whose name a new research grant has just been endowed at the University of California Berkeley. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
” [Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Riley v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
Florence v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:50 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:03 am
At California Lawyer, Thomas Brom discusses the state of campaign finance law, including American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
At The Least Dangerous Blog, Joel Nolette weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
Yesterday the Court issued an opinion in Hall v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 12:44 pm
City of Oakland, California v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
In Trevino v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:34 am
”Tom Goldstein of SCOTUSblog calls the 5-4 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:02 pm
Rosenburg v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
California – police authority under Fourth Amendment to search a smartphone taken from an individual at the time of arrest United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Sims, the Court summarily reversed a decision by the Ninth Circuit that would have allowed a lawsuit against a California police officer to proceed. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
On the other hand, the Supreme Court’s decision in Calder v. [read post]
