Search for: "Gomez v. Sup. Ct."
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2016, 8:28 am
Ct. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 2:27 pm
Ct. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm
Gomez-Jimenez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:12 am
Sup. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Background Before discussing the remedy, let me give you some necessary background to Justice Bucaria’s unreported decision last month in Carrillos v Gomez, Short Form Order, Index No. 023142/10 [Sup Ct Nassau County Aug. 28, 2015]. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:47 am
In Worbes Corp. v Sebrow (74 Misc 3d 1229 [A] [Sup Ct, Bronx County 2022]), Justice Fidel E. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 2:22 am
Gomez, 30 Misc 3d 643 (Sup Ct, Bronx County 2010); People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
While the statute does not limit recovery only to the offending attorney’s client (see Fields v Turner, 1Misc2d 679, 680-681 [Sup Ct, NY County 1955]), “[t]he ‘party’ referred to is clearly a party to an action pending in a court in reference to which the deceit is practiced, and not a person outside, not connected with the same at the time or with the court” (Gelmin v Quicke, 224 AD2d 481, 483 [2d Dept 1996], quoting… [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Supreme CourtØ Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch ListØ SCOTUSblog's most recent Petition to Watch hereØ Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases- Pending and Decided herePetition for Cert Granted:Crawford v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Scott V. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:23 am
Group II LLC v Nabe (2022 NY Slip Op 30399[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
