Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 49,922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
There have been some striking rulings cutting back on agency power, such as West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:29 am
Due to a mistake by the store, BL’s goods and his forms were given to the wrong customer, as a result of which that other customer held BL’s goods and forms for about 30 minutes until the store realised the error and retrieved them. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The case, Thaler v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:27 pm
His Honour stated that “transparency is not an independent element of unfairness as defined in s 12BG(1)”[10] and, accordingly, must be considered within the context of the three criteria within that section. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:50 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
" Even if one had good reason to believe that the ordinance aimed only at quiet, one still would likely conclude that it covers electric cars because, as Justice Scalia wrote for the Court in Oncale v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
In Matter of Ferrelli v State of New York, (App. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For that reason, a properly crafted rule (of the kind most universities have) to prevent it would certainly be constitutionally permissible, and (in my opinion) a good idea. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
(This strikes me as a good argument, because it appears to be true. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:43 pm
for $1.2 million in which the County is suing the City for (1) dangerous condition of public property, (2) trespass, (3) nuisance, (4) waste, (5) indemnity and contribution, (6) removal of lateral and “subadjacent” (sic) support, (7) declaratory relief, (8) account stated, and (9) goods and services rendered. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:41 am
Yesterday in my conflict of laws class I taught South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:49 am
Labrador v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm
ZERO MEAT v MEAT ZERO Background On 29 September 2021, CPF Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. [read post]
